<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Repurchase Offers Summary - Corporate Securities Legal]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.securitieslegal.com/securities-blog/categories/repurchase-offers-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.securitieslegal.com/securities-blog/categories/repurchase-offers-summary/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Corporate Securities Legal's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 17:00:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Repurchase Offers Summary]]></title>
                <link>https://www.securitieslegal.com/securities-blog/repurchase-offers-summary/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.securitieslegal.com/securities-blog/repurchase-offers-summary/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Corporate Securities Legal]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 20:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Repurchase Offers Summary]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securitieslegal]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[startup legal counsel]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexis King On February 14, 1975, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Willie R. Barnes, issued a release on Repurchase Offers that commented on Section 25507 (b) of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968.(link to release)This release also discussed Rule 260.507 of the California Code of Regulations in the context of the rule’s&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p><strong>Alexis King </strong></p>
 <p>On February 14, 1975, Commissioner of Corporations of the State
 of California, <a href="/practice-areas/securities-law/">Willie
 R. Barnes</a>, issued a release on Repurchase Offers that commented on Section
 25507 (b) of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968.<strong>(link to release)</strong>This release also discussed Rule 260.507 of the <a href="/practice-areas/securities-law/">California Code of
 Regulations</a> in the context of the rule’s requirements for issuing an offer
 under Section 25507 (b). </p>
 <p>Section 25507 (b) bars suit if the buyer receives a written
 offer approved by the Commissioner before the suit begins. The written proposal
 must contain:</p>
 <ul class="wp-block-list"><li>an offer to repurchase the security for cash
 price (payable on delivery of the security);</li><li> a cash
 offer to pay the buyer an amount recoverable by him under Section 25503 <strong><a href="/practice-areas/securities-law/">(link to 25503); or</a></strong></li><li>an offer to rescind the transaction by putting
 the parties back in the same position they were in before the transaction. </li></ul>
 <p>Rule 260.507 sets forth requirements related to an offer’s
 content. These requirements include thatan offer mustbe in writing and that an
 offer mustcontain necessary information about the offeree’s investment decision
 related to the offer.</p>
 <p><strong><em>Selective Offers </em></strong></p>
 <p>Rule 260.507 details the application requirements when
 seeking the Commissioner’s approval of an offer. Item 6(a) of the application
 form requires disclosure of any offer made to less than all investors as to
 whom liability may exist. Substantial unfairness results when offers are only made
 to selected shareholders, and there is only sufficient justificationfor partial
 repurchase offers in unusual circumstances. Lacking sufficient funds to meet
 offers if all shareholders accept is not a sufficient basis for according
 preferences to selected investors. </p>
 <p><strong><em>Valuation of Consideration</em></strong></p>
 <p>Item 6(b) of the application form requires a showing of the
 basis for the value of the initial consideration paid by the buyers when the
 initial consideration was not cash, but a cash repurchase offer is anticipated.
 It is unsatisfactory to consider the valuation of the consideration as merely
 nominal in particular circumstances. These situations include reorganizations,
 recapitalizations, or employee stock options. </p>
 <p><strong><em>Rescission</em></strong></p>
 <p>Section 25507 (b) states that when rescission is to be
 offered, the rescission must put the parties in the same situation they were in
 before the transaction occurred.Often, an offer will be considered illusory or
 misleading unless the obligations of the offeror and offeree (and sometimes third
 parties) are described. The obligations must include specific provisions stipulating
 the time frame when performance of an offer must be completed. </p>
 <p>An offeree can commence an action under the statute if the
 offeree rejects the offer on the basis that offered damages or rescission are
 insufficientwhen there is reasonable doubt about the sufficiency of the offer. This
 condition is only imposed if the consideration paid by the offeree is not
 monetary, or if rescission is offered. </p>
 <p><a href="/">The Commissioner</a> will generally require that adequate protection is afforded to securities and other transmitted property. The offer must be sent within thirty days after Commissioner approval. The specified time period could be extended if a showing Is made within a reasonable time after Commissioner approval. </p>
 <p><strong><em>Required Warnings in Offers</em></strong></p>
 <p>If all offerees accept and the total assets of the offeror
 are not enough to meet cash demands, a repurchase offer will generally not be
 approved. Information furnished to the offeree must include descriptions of
 situations where possible acceptances may jeopardize the offeror from continuing
 in business or where possible acceptances may imperil the interests of the
 offeree. Further, the offer must provide adequate warning to those who reject
 the offer if they discover that the issuer is finding it difficult or impossible
 to continue in business after rejection. </p>
 <p>The Commissioner may impose a condition that operates to
 void the offer ifthe issuer is disabled from continuing business because of
 acceptances. This revives the right of offerees to assert their civil remedies.</p>
 <p><strong><em>Thirty Day Waiting Period</em></strong></p>
 <p><a href="/practice-areas/securities-law/">Section
 25507</a> Subdivision (b)(3) provides a statutory “waiting period” of thirty
 days after the receipt of the offer when the offer cannot be accepted by the
 buyer. The purpose of the provision is to give the offerees adequate time to think
 about their interests in the matter whenconsidering potential complexities.
 This condition does not preclude an offereefrom rejecting
 the offer prior to the specified time period. The offeree may deem termination
 to be in his best interests and in this situation, the statutory waiting period
 does not serve public interest. </p>
 <p><strong><em>Legend Conditions</em></strong></p>
 <p><a href="/practice-areas/securities-law/">Subsection
 8 D(9) stipulates</a> that the possibility of an imposition of a legend
 condition must be disclosed in the offer. However, this disclosure is not
 mandatory where the facts are such that the imposition of a legend condition is
 a remote possibility. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>